-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Лев Толстой
-
- Война и мир
-
- Стр. 1253/1273
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
A
return
to
the
first
is
impossible
,
the
belief
has
been
destroyed
;
and
so
it
is
essential
to
explain
what
is
meant
by
power
.
Napoleon
ordered
an
army
to
be
raised
and
go
to
war
.
We
are
so
accustomed
to
that
idea
and
have
become
so
used
to
it
that
the
question
:
why
did
six
hundred
thousand
men
go
to
fight
when
Napoleon
uttered
certain
words
,
seems
to
us
senseless
.
He
had
the
power
and
so
what
he
ordered
was
done
.
This
reply
is
quite
satisfactory
if
we
believe
that
the
power
was
given
him
by
God
.
But
as
soon
as
we
do
not
admit
that
,
it
becomes
essential
to
determine
what
is
this
power
of
one
man
over
others
.
It
can
not
be
the
direct
physical
power
of
a
strong
man
over
a
weak
one
--
a
domination
based
on
the
application
or
threat
of
physical
force
,
like
the
power
of
Hercules
;
nor
can
it
be
based
on
the
effect
of
moral
force
,
as
in
their
simplicity
some
historians
think
who
say
that
the
leading
figures
in
history
are
heroes
,
that
is
,
men
gifted
with
a
special
strength
of
soul
and
mind
called
genius
.
This
power
can
not
be
based
on
the
predominance
of
moral
strength
,
for
,
not
to
mention
heroes
such
as
Napoleon
about
whose
moral
qualities
opinions
differ
widely
,
history
shows
us
that
neither
a
Louis
XI
nor
a
Metternich
,
who
ruled
over
millions
of
people
,
had
any
particular
moral
qualities
,
but
on
the
contrary
were
generally
morally
weaker
than
any
of
the
millions
they
ruled
over
.
If
the
source
of
power
lies
neither
in
the
physical
nor
in
the
moral
qualities
of
him
who
possesses
it
,
it
must
evidently
be
looked
for
elsewhere
--
in
the
relation
to
the
people
of
the
man
who
wields
the
power
.
And
that
is
how
power
is
understood
by
the
science
of
jurisprudence
,
that
exchange
bank
of
history
which
offers
to
exchange
history
's
understanding
of
power
for
true
gold
.
Power
is
the
collective
will
of
the
people
transferred
,
by
expressed
or
tacit
consent
,
to
their
chosen
rulers
.
In
the
domain
of
jurisprudence
,
which
consists
of
discussions
of
how
a
state
and
power
might
be
arranged
were
it
possible
for
all
that
to
be
arranged
,
it
is
all
very
clear
;
but
when
applied
to
history
that
definition
of
power
needs
explanation
.
The
science
of
jurisprudence
regards
the
state
and
power
as
the
ancients
regarded
fire
--
namely
,
as
something
existing
absolutely
.
But
for
history
,
the
state
and
power
are
merely
phenomena
,
just
as
for
modern
physics
fire
is
not
an
element
but
a
phenomenon
.
