Понятно
Понятно
Для того чтобы воспользоваться закладками, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Отмена
Here
we
live
,
and
know
nothing
of
what
s
going
on
,
Vronsky
said
to
Golenishtchev
as
he
came
to
see
him
one
morning
.
Have
you
seen
Mihailov
s
picture
?
he
said
,
handing
him
a
Russian
gazette
he
had
received
that
morning
,
and
pointing
to
an
article
on
a
Russian
artist
,
living
in
the
very
same
town
,
and
just
finishing
a
picture
which
had
long
been
talked
about
,
and
had
been
bought
beforehand
.
The
article
reproached
the
government
and
the
academy
for
letting
so
remarkable
an
artist
be
left
without
encouragement
and
support
.
I
ve
seen
it
,
answered
Golenishtchev
.
Of
course
,
he
s
not
without
talent
,
but
it
s
all
in
a
wrong
direction
.
It
s
all
the
Ivanov
-
Strauss
-
Renan
attitude
to
Christ
and
to
religious
painting
.
Отключить рекламу
What
is
the
subject
of
the
picture
?
asked
Anna
.
Christ
before
Pilate
.
Christ
is
represented
as
a
Jew
with
all
the
realism
of
the
new
school
.
And
the
question
of
the
subject
of
the
picture
having
brought
him
to
one
of
his
favorite
theories
,
Golenishtchev
launched
forth
into
a
disquisition
on
it
.
I
can
t
understand
how
they
can
fall
into
such
a
gross
mistake
.
Christ
always
has
His
definite
embodiment
in
the
art
of
the
great
masters
.
And
therefore
,
if
they
want
to
depict
,
not
God
,
but
a
revolutionist
or
a
sage
,
let
them
take
from
history
a
Socrates
,
a
Franklin
,
a
Charlotte
Corday
,
but
not
Christ
.
They
take
the
very
figure
which
cannot
be
taken
for
their
art
,
and
then
.
.
.
.
Отключить рекламу
And
is
it
true
that
this
Mihailov
is
in
such
poverty
?
asked
Vronsky
,
thinking
that
,
as
a
Russian
Mæcenas
,
it
was
his
duty
to
assist
the
artist
regardless
of
whether
the
picture
were
good
or
bad
.
I
should
say
not
.
He
s
a
remarkable
portrait
-
painter
.
Have
you
ever
seen
his
portrait
of
Madame
Vassiltchikova
?
But
I
believe
he
doesn
t
care
about
painting
any
more
portraits
,
and
so
very
likely
he
is
in
want
.
I
maintain
that
.
.
.
.
Couldn
t
we
ask
him
to
paint
a
portrait
of
Anna
Arkadyevna
?
said
Vronsky
.