-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Лев Толстой
-
- Анна Каренина
-
- Стр. 340/828
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
“
Yes
,
the
thing
’
s
done
at
Mihail
Petrovitch
’
s
,
but
ask
him
how
it
’
s
done
.
Do
you
call
that
a
rational
system
?
”
said
the
landowner
,
obviously
rather
proud
of
the
word
“
rational
.
”
“
My
system
’
s
very
simple
,
”
said
Mihail
Petrovitch
,
“
thank
God
.
All
my
management
rests
on
getting
the
money
ready
for
the
autumn
taxes
,
and
the
peasants
come
to
me
,
‘
Father
,
master
,
help
us
!
’
Well
,
the
peasants
are
all
one
’
s
neighbors
;
one
feels
for
them
.
So
one
advances
them
a
third
,
but
one
says
:
‘
Remember
,
lads
,
I
have
helped
you
,
and
you
must
help
me
when
I
need
it
—
whether
it
’
s
the
sowing
of
the
oats
,
or
the
haycutting
,
or
the
harvest
’
;
and
well
,
one
agrees
,
so
much
for
each
taxpayer
—
though
there
are
dishonest
ones
among
them
too
,
it
’
s
true
.
”
Levin
,
who
had
long
been
familiar
with
these
patriarchal
methods
,
exchanged
glances
with
Sviazhsky
and
interrupted
Mihail
Petrovitch
,
turning
again
to
the
gentleman
with
the
gray
whiskers
.
“
Then
what
do
you
think
?
”
he
asked
;
“
what
system
is
one
to
adopt
nowadays
?
”
“
Why
,
manage
like
Mihail
Petrovitch
,
or
let
the
land
for
half
the
crop
or
for
rent
to
the
peasants
;
that
one
can
do
—
only
that
’
s
just
how
the
general
prosperity
of
the
country
is
being
ruined
.
Where
the
land
with
serf
-
labor
and
good
management
gave
a
yield
of
nine
to
one
,
on
the
half
-
crop
system
it
yields
three
to
one
.
Russia
has
been
ruined
by
the
emancipation
!
”
Sviazhsky
looked
with
smiling
eyes
at
Levin
,
and
even
made
a
faint
gesture
of
irony
to
him
;
but
Levin
did
not
think
the
landowner
’
s
words
absurd
,
he
understood
them
better
than
he
did
Sviazhsky
.
A
great
deal
more
of
what
the
gentleman
with
the
gray
whiskers
said
to
show
in
what
way
Russia
was
ruined
by
the
emancipation
struck
him
indeed
as
very
true
,
new
to
him
,
and
quite
incontestable
.
The
landowner
unmistakably
spoke
his
own
individual
thought
—
a
thing
that
very
rarely
happens
—
and
a
thought
to
which
he
had
been
brought
not
by
a
desire
of
finding
some
exercise
for
an
idle
brain
,
but
a
thought
which
had
grown
up
out
of
the
conditions
of
his
life
,
which
he
had
brooded
over
in
the
solitude
of
his
village
,
and
had
considered
in
every
aspect
.
“
The
point
is
,
don
’
t
you
see
,
that
progress
of
every
sort
is
only
made
by
the
use
of
authority
,
”
he
said
,
evidently
wishing
to
show
he
was
not
without
culture
.
“
Take
the
reforms
of
Peter
,
of
Catherine
,
of
Alexander
.
Take
European
history
.
And
progress
in
agriculture
more
than
anything
else
—
the
potato
,
for
instance
,
that
was
introduced
among
us
by
force
.
The
wooden
plough
too
wasn
’
t
always
used
.
It
was
introduced
maybe
in
the
days
before
the
Empire
,
but
it
was
probably
brought
in
by
force
.
Now
,
in
our
own
day
,
we
landowners
in
the
serf
times
used
various
improvements
in
our
husbandry
:
drying
machines
and
thrashing
machines
,
and
carting
manure
and
all
the
modern
implements
—
all
that
we
brought
into
use
by
our
authority
,
and
the
peasants
opposed
it
at
first
,
and
ended
by
imitating
us
.
Now
,
by
the
abolition
of
serfdom
we
have
been
deprived
of
our
authority
;
and
so
our
husbandry
,
where
it
had
been
raised
to
a
high
level
,
is
bound
to
sink
to
the
most
savage
primitive
condition
.
That
’
s
how
I
see
it
.
”
“
But
why
so
?
If
it
’
s
rational
,
you
’
ll
be
able
to
keep
up
the
same
system
with
hired
labor
,
”
said
Sviazhsky
.
