Понятно
Понятно
Для того чтобы воспользоваться закладками, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Отмена
Granted
,
but
it
s
work
in
the
sense
that
his
activity
produces
a
result
the
railways
.
But
of
course
you
think
the
railways
useless
.
No
,
that
s
another
question
;
I
am
prepared
to
admit
that
they
re
useful
.
But
all
profit
that
is
out
of
proportion
to
the
labor
expended
is
dishonest
.
But
who
is
to
define
what
is
proportionate
?
Отключить рекламу
Making
profit
by
dishonest
means
,
by
trickery
,
said
Levin
,
conscious
that
he
could
not
draw
a
distinct
line
between
honesty
and
dishonesty
.
Such
as
banking
,
for
instance
,
he
went
on
.
It
s
an
evil
the
amassing
of
huge
fortunes
without
labor
,
just
the
same
thing
as
with
the
spirit
monopolies
,
it
s
only
the
form
that
s
changed
.
Le
roi
est
mort
,
vive
le
roi
.
No
sooner
were
the
spirit
monopolies
abolished
than
the
railways
came
up
,
and
banking
companies
;
that
,
too
,
is
profit
without
work
.
Yes
,
that
may
all
be
very
true
and
clever
.
.
.
.
Lie
down
,
Krak
!
Stepan
Arkadyevitch
called
to
his
dog
,
who
was
scratching
and
turning
over
all
the
hay
.
He
was
obviously
convinced
of
the
correctness
of
his
position
,
and
so
talked
serenely
and
without
haste
.
But
you
have
not
drawn
the
line
between
honest
and
dishonest
work
.
That
I
receive
a
bigger
salary
than
my
chief
clerk
,
though
he
knows
more
about
the
work
than
I
do
that
s
dishonest
,
I
suppose
?
I
can
t
say
.
Отключить рекламу
Well
,
but
I
can
tell
you
:
your
receiving
some
five
thousand
,
let
s
say
,
for
your
work
on
the
land
,
while
our
host
,
the
peasant
here
,
however
hard
he
works
,
can
never
get
more
than
fifty
roubles
,
is
just
as
dishonest
as
my
earning
more
than
my
chief
clerk
,
and
Malthus
getting
more
than
a
station
-
master
.
No
,
quite
the
contrary
;
I
see
that
society
takes
up
a
sort
of
antagonistic
attitude
to
these
people
,
which
is
utterly
baseless
,
and
I
fancy
there
s
envy
at
the
bottom
of
it
.
.
.
.
No
,
that
s
unfair
,
said
Veslovsky
;
how
could
envy
come
in
?
There
is
something
not
nice
about
that
sort
of
business
.
You
say
,
Levin
went
on
,
that
it
s
unjust
for
me
to
receive
five
thousand
,
while
the
peasant
has
fifty
;
that
s
true
.
It
is
unfair
,
and
I
feel
it
,
but
.
.
.
.