-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Лев Толстой
-
- Анна Каренина
-
- Стр. 483/828
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Of
course
there
is
the
expression
of
an
official
in
Pilate
and
of
pity
in
Christ
,
seeing
that
one
is
the
incarnation
of
the
fleshly
and
the
other
of
the
spiritual
life
.
All
this
and
much
more
flashed
into
Mihailov
’
s
thoughts
.
“
Yes
,
and
how
that
figure
is
done
—
what
atmosphere
!
One
can
walk
round
it
,
”
said
Golenishtchev
,
unmistakably
betraying
by
this
remark
that
he
did
not
approve
of
the
meaning
and
idea
of
the
figure
.
“
Yes
,
there
’
s
a
wonderful
mastery
!
”
said
Vronsky
.
“
How
those
figures
in
the
background
stand
out
!
There
you
have
technique
,
”
he
said
,
addressing
Golenishtchev
,
alluding
to
a
conversation
between
them
about
Vronsky
’
s
despair
of
attaining
this
technique
.
“
Yes
,
yes
,
marvelous
!
”
Golenishtchev
and
Anna
assented
.
In
spite
of
the
excited
condition
in
which
he
was
,
the
sentence
about
technique
had
sent
a
pang
to
Mihailov
’
s
heart
,
and
looking
angrily
at
Vronsky
he
suddenly
scowled
.
He
had
often
heard
this
word
technique
,
and
was
utterly
unable
to
understand
what
was
understood
by
it
.
He
knew
that
by
this
term
was
understood
a
mechanical
facility
for
painting
or
drawing
,
entirely
apart
from
its
subject
.
He
had
noticed
often
that
even
in
actual
praise
technique
was
opposed
to
essential
quality
,
as
though
one
could
paint
well
something
that
was
bad
.
He
knew
that
a
great
deal
of
attention
and
care
was
necessary
in
taking
off
the
coverings
,
to
avoid
injuring
the
creation
itself
,
and
to
take
off
all
the
coverings
;
but
there
was
no
art
of
painting
—
no
technique
of
any
sort
—
about
it
.
If
to
a
little
child
or
to
his
cook
were
revealed
what
he
saw
,
it
or
she
would
have
been
able
to
peel
the
wrappings
off
what
was
seen
.
And
the
most
experienced
and
adroit
painter
could
not
by
mere
mechanical
facility
paint
anything
if
the
lines
of
the
subject
were
not
revealed
to
him
first
.
Besides
,
he
saw
that
if
it
came
to
talking
about
technique
,
it
was
impossible
to
praise
him
for
it
.
In
all
he
had
painted
and
repainted
he
saw
faults
that
hurt
his
eyes
,
coming
from
want
of
care
in
taking
off
the
wrappings
—
faults
he
could
not
correct
now
without
spoiling
the
whole
.
And
in
almost
all
the
figures
and
faces
he
saw
,
too
,
remnants
of
the
wrappings
not
perfectly
removed
that
spoiled
the
picture
.
“
One
thing
might
be
said
,
if
you
will
allow
me
to
make
the
remark
.
.
.
.
”
observed
Golenishtchev
.
“
Oh
,
I
shall
be
delighted
,
I
beg
you
,
”
said
Mihailov
with
a
forced
smile
.
“
That
is
,
that
you
make
Him
the
man
-
god
,
and
not
the
God
-
man
.
But
I
know
that
was
what
you
meant
to
do
.
”
“
I
cannot
paint
a
Christ
that
is
not
in
my
heart
,
”
said
Mihailov
gloomily
.
“
Yes
;
but
in
that
case
,
if
you
will
allow
me
to
say
what
I
think
.
.
.
.
Your
picture
is
so
fine
that
my
observation
cannot
detract
from
it
,
and
,
besides
,
it
is
only
my
personal
opinion
.
With
you
it
is
different
.
Your
very
motive
is
different
.
But
let
us
take
Ivanov
.
I
imagine
that
if
Christ
is
brought
down
to
the
level
of
an
historical
character
,
it
would
have
been
better
for
Ivanov
to
select
some
other
historical
subject
,
fresh
,
untouched
.
”
