-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Франц Кафка
-
- Процесс
-
- Стр. 40/42
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Even
if
all
he
said
about
his
power
and
the
power
of
the
other
doorkeepers
and
how
not
even
he
could
bear
the
sight
of
them
-
I
say
even
if
all
these
assertions
are
right
,
the
way
he
makes
them
shows
that
he
's
too
simple
and
arrogant
to
understand
properly
.
The
commentators
say
about
this
that
,
"
correct
understanding
of
a
matter
and
a
misunderstanding
of
the
same
matter
are
not
mutually
exclusive
"
.
Whether
they
're
right
or
not
,
you
have
to
concede
that
his
simplicity
and
arrogance
,
however
little
they
show
,
do
weaken
his
function
of
guarding
the
entrance
,
they
are
defects
in
the
doorkeeper
's
character
.
You
also
have
to
consider
that
the
doorkeeper
seems
to
be
friendly
by
nature
,
he
is
n't
always
just
an
official
.
He
makes
a
joke
right
at
the
beginning
,
in
that
he
invites
the
man
to
enter
at
the
same
time
as
maintaining
the
ban
on
his
entering
,
and
then
he
does
n't
send
him
away
but
gives
him
,
as
it
says
in
the
text
,
a
stool
to
sit
on
and
lets
him
stay
by
the
side
of
the
door
.
The
patience
with
which
he
puts
up
with
the
man
's
requests
through
all
these
years
,
the
little
questioning
sessions
,
accepting
the
gifts
,
his
politeness
when
he
puts
up
with
the
man
cursing
his
fate
even
though
it
was
the
doorkeeper
who
caused
that
fate
-
all
these
things
seem
to
want
to
arouse
our
sympathy
.
Not
every
doorkeeper
would
have
behaved
in
the
same
way
.
And
finally
,
he
lets
the
man
beckon
him
and
he
bends
deep
down
to
him
so
that
he
can
put
his
last
question
.
There
's
no
more
than
some
slight
impatience
-
the
doorkeeper
knows
everything
's
come
to
its
end
-
shown
in
the
words
,
"
You
're
insatiable
"
.
There
are
many
commentators
who
go
even
further
in
explaining
it
in
this
way
and
think
the
words
,
"
you
're
insatiable
"
are
an
expression
of
friendly
admiration
,
albeit
with
some
condescension
.
However
you
look
at
it
the
figure
of
the
doorkeeper
comes
out
differently
from
how
you
might
think
.
"
"
You
know
the
story
better
than
I
do
and
you
've
known
it
for
longer
,
"
said
K
.
They
were
silent
for
a
while
.
And
then
K.
said
,
"
So
you
think
the
man
was
not
cheated
,
do
you
?
"
"
Do
n't
get
me
wrong
,
"
said
the
priest
,
"
I
'm
just
pointing
out
the
different
opinions
about
it
.
You
should
n't
pay
too
much
attention
to
people
's
opinions
.
The
text
can
not
be
altered
,
and
the
various
opinions
are
often
no
more
than
an
expression
of
despair
over
it
.
There
's
even
one
opinion
which
says
it
's
the
doorkeeper
who
's
been
cheated
.
"
"
That
does
seem
to
take
things
too
far
,
"
said
K.
"
How
can
they
argue
the
doorkeeper
has
been
cheated
?
"
"
Their
argument
,
"
answered
the
priest
,
"
is
based
on
the
simplicity
of
the
doorkeeper
.
They
say
the
doorkeeper
does
n't
know
the
inside
of
the
law
,
only
the
way
into
it
where
he
just
walks
up
and
down
.
They
see
his
ideas
of
what
's
inside
the
law
as
rather
childish
,
and
suppose
he
's
afraid
himself
of
what
he
wants
to
make
the
man
frightened
of
.
Yes
,
he
's
more
afraid
of
it
than
the
man
,
as
the
man
wants
nothing
but
to
go
inside
the
law
,
even
after
he
's
heard
about
the
terrible
doormen
there
,
in
contrast
to
the
doorkeeper
who
does
n't
want
to
go
in
,
or
at
least
we
do
n't
hear
anything
about
it
.
On
the
other
hand
,
there
are
those
who
say
he
must
have
already
been
inside
the
law
as
he
has
been
taken
on
into
its
service
and
that
could
only
have
been
done
inside
.
That
can
be
countered
by
supposing
he
could
have
been
given
the
job
of
doorkeeper
by
somebody
calling
out
from
inside
,
and
that
he
ca
n't
have
gone
very
far
inside
as
he
could
n't
bear
the
sight
of
the
third
doorkeeper
.
Nor
,
through
all
those
years
,
does
the
story
say
the
doorkeeper
told
the
man
anything
about
the
inside
,
other
than
his
comment
about
the
other
doorkeepers
.
He
could
have
been
forbidden
to
do
so
,
but
he
has
n't
said
anything
about
that
either
.
All
this
seems
to
show
he
does
n't
know
anything
about
what
the
inside
looks
like
or
what
it
means
,
and
that
that
's
why
he
's
being
deceived
.
But
he
's
also
being
deceived
by
the
man
from
the
country
as
he
's
this
man
's
subordinate
and
does
n't
know
it
.
There
's
a
lot
to
indicate
that
he
treats
the
man
as
his
subordinate
,
I
expect
you
remember
,
but
those
who
hold
this
view
would
say
it
's
very
clear
that
he
really
is
his
subordinate
.
Above
all
,
the
free
man
is
superior
to
the
man
who
has
to
serve
another
.
Now
,
the
man
really
is
free
,
he
can
go
wherever
he
wants
,
the
only
thing
forbidden
to
him
is
entry
into
the
law
and
,
what
's
more
,
there
's
only
one
man
forbidding
him
to
do
so
-
the
doorkeeper
.
If
he
takes
the
stool
and
sits
down
beside
the
door
and
stays
there
all
his
life
he
does
this
of
his
own
free
will
,
there
's
nothing
in
the
story
to
say
he
was
forced
to
do
it
.
On
the
other
hand
,
the
doorkeeper
is
kept
to
his
post
by
his
employment
,
he
's
not
allowed
to
go
away
from
it
and
it
seems
he
's
not
allowed
to
go
inside
either
,
not
even
if
he
wanted
to
.
Also
,
although
he
's
in
the
service
of
the
law
he
's
only
there
for
this
one
entrance
,
therefore
he
's
there
only
in
the
service
of
this
one
man
who
the
door
's
intended
for
.
This
is
another
way
in
which
he
's
his
subordinate
.
We
can
take
it
that
he
's
been
performing
this
somewhat
empty
service
for
many
years
,
through
the
whole
of
a
man
's
life
,
as
it
says
that
a
man
will
come
,
that
means
someone
old
enough
to
be
a
man
.
That
means
the
doorkeeper
will
have
to
wait
a
long
time
before
his
function
is
fulfilled
,
he
will
have
to
wait
for
as
long
as
the
man
liked
,
who
came
to
the
door
of
his
own
free
will
.
Even
the
end
of
the
doorkeeper
's
service
is
determined
by
when
the
man
's
life
ends
,
so
the
doorkeeper
remains
his
subordinate
right
to
the
end
.
And
it
's
pointed
out
repeatedly
that
the
doorkeeper
seems
to
know
nothing
of
any
of
this
,
although
this
is
not
seen
as
anything
remarkable
,
as
those
who
hold
this
view
see
the
doorkeeper
as
deluded
in
a
way
that
's
far
worse
,
a
way
that
's
to
do
with
his
service
.
At
the
end
,
speaking
about
the
entrance
he
says
,
"
Now
I
'll
go
and
close
it
"
,
although
at
the
beginning
of
the
story
it
says
the
door
to
the
law
is
open
as
it
always
is
,
but
if
it
's
always
open
-
always
-
that
means
it
's
open
independently
of
the
lifespan
of
the
man
it
's
intended
for
,
and
not
even
the
doorkeeper
will
be
able
to
close
it
.
There
are
various
opinions
about
this
,
some
say
the
doorkeeper
was
only
answering
a
question
or
showing
his
devotion
to
duty
or
,
just
when
the
man
was
in
his
last
moments
,
the
doorkeeper
wanted
to
cause
him
regret
and
sorrow
.
There
are
many
who
agree
that
he
would
n't
be
able
to
close
the
door
.
They
even
believe
,
at
the
end
at
least
,
the
doorkeeper
is
aware
,
deep
down
,
that
he
's
the
man
's
subordinate
,
as
the
man
sees
the
light
that
shines
out
of
the
entry
to
the
law
whereas
the
doorkeeper
would
probably
have
his
back
to
it
and
says
nothing
at
all
to
show
there
's
been
any
change
.
"
"
That
is
well
substantiated
,
"
said
K.
,
who
had
been
repeating
some
parts
of
the
priest
's
explanation
to
himself
in
a
whisper
.
"
It
is
well
substantiated
,
and
now
I
too
think
the
doorkeeper
must
have
been
deceived
.
Although
that
does
not
mean
I
've
abandoned
what
I
thought
earlier
as
the
two
versions
are
,
to
some
extent
,
not
incompatible
.
It
's
not
clear
whether
the
doorkeeper
sees
clearly
or
is
deceived
.
I
said
the
man
had
been
cheated
.
If
the
doorkeeper
understands
clearly
,
then
there
could
be
some
doubt
about
it
,
but
if
the
doorkeeper
has
been
deceived
then
the
man
is
bound
to
believe
the
same
thing
.
That
would
mean
the
doorkeeper
is
not
a
cheat
but
so
simple-minded
that
he
ought
to
be
dismissed
from
his
job
immediately
;
if
the
doorkeeper
is
mistaken
it
will
do
him
no
harm
but
the
man
will
be
harmed
immensely
.
"
"
There
you
've
found
another
opinion
,
"
said
the
priest
,
"
as
there
are
many
who
say
the
story
does
n't
give
anyone
the
right
to
judge
the
doorkeeper
.
However
he
might
seem
to
us
he
is
still
in
the
service
of
the
law
,
so
he
belongs
to
the
law
,
so
he
's
beyond
what
man
has
a
right
to
judge
.
In
this
case
we
ca
n't
believe
the
doorkeeper
is
the
man
's
subordinate
.
Even
if
he
has
to
stay
at
the
entrance
into
the
law
his
service
makes
him
incomparably
more
than
if
he
lived
freely
in
the
world
.
The
man
has
come
to
the
law
for
the
first
time
and
the
doorkeeper
is
already
there
.
He
's
been
given
his
position
by
the
law
,
to
doubt
his
worth
would
be
to
doubt
the
law
.
"
"
I
ca
n't
say
I
'm
in
complete
agreement
with
this
view
,
"
said
K.
shaking
his
head
,
"
as
if
you
accept
it
you
'll
have
to
accept
that
everything
said
by
the
doorkeeper
is
true
.
But
you
've
already
explained
very
fully
that
that
's
not
possible
.
"
"
No
,
"
said
the
priest
,
"
you
do
n't
need
to
accept
everything
as
true
,
you
only
have
to
accept
it
as
necessary
.
"
"
Depressing
view
,
"
said
K.
"
The
lie
made
into
the
rule
of
the
world
.
"
K.
said
that
as
if
it
were
his
final
word
but
it
was
not
his
conclusion
.
He
was
too
tired
to
think
about
all
the
ramifications
of
the
story
,
and
the
sort
of
thoughts
they
led
him
into
were
not
familiar
to
him
,
unrealistic
things
,
things
better
suited
for
officials
of
the
court
to
discuss
than
for
him
.
The
simple
story
had
lost
its
shape
,
he
wanted
to
shake
it
off
,
and
the
priest
who
now
felt
quite
compassionate
allowed
this
and
accepted
K.
's
remarks
without
comment
,
even
though
his
view
was
certainly
very
different
from
K.
's
.
In
silence
,
they
carried
on
walking
for
some
time
,
K.
stayed
close
beside
the
priest
without
knowing
where
he
was
.
The
lamp
in
his
hand
had
long
since
gone
out
.
Once
,
just
in
front
of
him
,
he
thought
he
could
see
the
statue
of
a
saint
by
the
glitter
of
the
silver
on
it
,
although
it
quickly
disappeared
back
into
the
darkness
.
So
that
he
would
not
remain
entirely
dependent
on
the
priest
,
K.
asked
him
,
"
We
're
now
near
the
main
entrance
,
are
we
?
"
"
No
,
"
said
the
priest
,
"
we
're
a
long
way
from
it
.
Do
you
already
want
to
go
?
"
K.
had
not
thought
of
going
until
then
,
but
he
immediately
said
,
"
Yes
,
certainly
,
I
have
to
go
.
I
'm
the
chief
clerk
in
a
bank
and
there
are
people
waiting
for
me
,
I
only
came
here
to
show
a
foreign
business
contact
round
the
cathedral
.
"
"
Alright
,
"
said
the
priest
offering
him
his
hand
,
"
go
then
.
"
"
But
I
ca
n't
find
my
way
round
in
this
darkness
by
myself
,
"
said
K.
"
Go
to
your
left
as
far
as
the
wall
,
"
said
the
priest
,
"
then
continue
alongside
the
wall
without
leaving
it
and
you
'll
find
a
way
out
.
"
The
priest
had
only
gone
a
few
paces
from
him
,
but
K
was
already
shouting
loudly
,
"
Please
,
wait
!
"
"
I
'm
waiting
,
"
said
the
priest
.
"
Is
there
anything
else
you
want
from
me
?
"
asked
K.
"
No
,
"
said
the
priest
.
"
You
were
so
friendly
to
me
earlier
on
,
"
said
K.
,
"
and
you
explained
everything
,
but
now
you
abandon
me
as
if
I
were
nothing
to
you
.
"
"
You
have
to
go
,
"
said
the
priest
.
"
Well
,
yes
,
"
said
K.
,
"
you
need
to
understand
that
.
"
"
First
,
you
need
to
understand
who
I
am
,
"
said
the
priest
.
"
You
're
the
prison
chaplain
,
"
said
K.
,
and
went
closer
to
the
priest
,
it
was
not
so
important
for
him
to
go
straight
back
to
the
bank
as
he
had
made
out
,
he
could
very
well
stay
where
he
was
.
"
So
that
means
I
belong
to
the
court
,
"
said
the
priest
.
"
So
why
would
I
want
anything
from
you
?
the
court
does
n't
want
anything
from
you
.
It
accepts
you
when
you
come
and
it
lets
you
go
when
you
leave
.
"
