-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Федор Достоевский
-
- Преступление и наказание
-
- Стр. 446/453
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Raskolnikov
refused
the
water
with
his
hand
,
and
softly
and
brokenly
,
but
distinctly
said
:
“
It
was
I
killed
the
old
pawnbroker
woman
and
her
sister
Lizaveta
with
an
axe
and
robbed
them
.
”
Ilya
Petrovitch
opened
his
mouth
.
People
ran
up
on
all
sides
.
Raskolnikov
repeated
his
statement
.
Siberia
.
On
the
banks
of
a
broad
solitary
river
stands
a
town
,
one
of
the
administrative
centres
of
Russia
;
in
the
town
there
is
a
fortress
,
in
the
fortress
there
is
a
prison
.
In
the
prison
the
second
-
class
convict
Rodion
Raskolnikov
has
been
confined
for
nine
months
.
Almost
a
year
and
a
half
has
passed
since
his
crime
.
There
had
been
little
difficulty
about
his
trial
.
The
criminal
adhered
exactly
,
firmly
,
and
clearly
to
his
statement
.
He
did
not
confuse
nor
misrepresent
the
facts
,
nor
soften
them
in
his
own
interest
,
nor
omit
the
smallest
detail
.
He
explained
every
incident
of
the
murder
,
the
secret
of
the
pledge
(
the
piece
of
wood
with
a
strip
of
metal
)
which
was
found
in
the
murdered
woman
’
s
hand
.
He
described
minutely
how
he
had
taken
her
keys
,
what
they
were
like
,
as
well
as
the
chest
and
its
contents
;
he
explained
the
mystery
of
Lizaveta
’
s
murder
;
described
how
Koch
and
,
after
him
,
the
student
knocked
,
and
repeated
all
they
had
said
to
one
another
;
how
he
afterwards
had
run
downstairs
and
heard
Nikolay
and
Dmitri
shouting
;
how
he
had
hidden
in
the
empty
flat
and
afterwards
gone
home
.
He
ended
by
indicating
the
stone
in
the
yard
off
the
Voznesensky
Prospect
under
which
the
purse
and
the
trinkets
were
found
.
The
whole
thing
,
in
fact
,
was
perfectly
clear
.
The
lawyers
and
the
judges
were
very
much
struck
,
among
other
things
,
by
the
fact
that
he
had
hidden
the
trinkets
and
the
purse
under
a
stone
,
without
making
use
of
them
,
and
that
,
what
was
more
,
he
did
not
now
remember
what
the
trinkets
were
like
,
or
even
how
many
there
were
.
The
fact
that
he
had
never
opened
the
purse
and
did
not
even
know
how
much
was
in
it
seemed
incredible
.
There
turned
out
to
be
in
the
purse
three
hundred
and
seventeen
roubles
and
sixty
copecks
.
From
being
so
long
under
the
stone
,
some
of
the
most
valuable
notes
lying
uppermost
had
suffered
from
the
damp
.
They
were
a
long
while
trying
to
discover
why
the
accused
man
should
tell
a
lie
about
this
,
when
about
everything
else
he
had
made
a
truthful
and
straightforward
confession
.
Finally
some
of
the
lawyers
more
versed
in
psychology
admitted
that
it
was
possible
he
had
really
not
looked
into
the
purse
,
and
so
didn
’
t
know
what
was
in
it
when
he
hid
it
under
the
stone
.
But
they
immediately
drew
the
deduction
that
the
crime
could
only
have
been
committed
through
temporary
mental
derangement
,
through
homicidal
mania
,
without
object
or
the
pursuit
of
gain
.
This
fell
in
with
the
most
recent
fashionable
theory
of
temporary
insanity
,
so
often
applied
in
our
days
in
criminal
cases
.
Moreover
Raskolnikov
’
s
hypochondriacal
condition
was
proved
by
many
witnesses
,
by
Dr
.
Zossimov
,
his
former
fellow
students
,
his
landlady
and
her
servant
.
All
this
pointed
strongly
to
the
conclusion
that
Raskolnikov
was
not
quite
like
an
ordinary
murderer
and
robber
,
but
that
there
was
another
element
in
the
case
.
To
the
intense
annoyance
of
those
who
maintained
this
opinion
,
the
criminal
scarcely
attempted
to
defend
himself
.
To
the
decisive
question
as
to
what
motive
impelled
him
to
the
murder
and
the
robbery
,
he
answered
very
clearly
with
the
coarsest
frankness
that
the
cause
was
his
miserable
position
,
his
poverty
and
helplessness
,
and
his
desire
to
provide
for
his
first
steps
in
life
by
the
help
of
the
three
thousand
roubles
he
had
reckoned
on
finding
.
He
had
been
led
to
the
murder
through
his
shallow
and
cowardly
nature
,
exasperated
moreover
by
privation
and
failure
.
To
the
question
what
led
him
to
confess
,
he
answered
that
it
was
his
heartfelt
repentance
.
All
this
was
almost
coarse
.
.
.
.
The
sentence
however
was
more
merciful
than
could
have
been
expected
,
perhaps
partly
because
the
criminal
had
not
tried
to
justify
himself
,
but
had
rather
shown
a
desire
to
exaggerate
his
guilt
.
All
the
strange
and
peculiar
circumstances
of
the
crime
were
taken
into
consideration
.
There
could
be
no
doubt
of
the
abnormal
and
poverty
-
stricken
condition
of
the
criminal
at
the
time
.
The
fact
that
he
had
made
no
use
of
what
he
had
stolen
was
put
down
partly
to
the
effect
of
remorse
,
partly
to
his
abnormal
mental
condition
at
the
time
of
the
crime
.
Incidentally
the
murder
of
Lizaveta
served
indeed
to
confirm
the
last
hypothesis
:
a
man
commits
two
murders
and
forgets
that
the
door
is
open
!
Finally
,
the
confession
,
at
the
very
moment
when
the
case
was
hopelessly
muddled
by
the
false
evidence
given
by
Nikolay
through
melancholy
and
fanaticism
,
and
when
,
moreover
,
there
were
no
proofs
against
the
real
criminal
,
no
suspicions
even
(
Porfiry
Petrovitch
fully
kept
his
word
)
—
all
this
did
much
to
soften
the
sentence
.
Other
circumstances
,
too
,
in
the
prisoner
’
s
favour
came
out
quite
unexpectedly
.
Razumihin
somehow
discovered
and
proved
that
while
Raskolnikov
was
at
the
university
he
had
helped
a
poor
consumptive
fellow
student
and
had
spent
his
last
penny
on
supporting
him
for
six
months
,
and
when
this
student
died
,
leaving
a
decrepit
old
father
whom
he
had
maintained
almost
from
his
thirteenth
year
,
Raskolnikov
had
got
the
old
man
into
a
hospital
and
paid
for
his
funeral
when
he
died
.
Raskolnikov
’
s
landlady
bore
witness
,
too
,
that
when
they
had
lived
in
another
house
at
Five
Corners
,
Raskolnikov
had
rescued
two
little
children
from
a
house
on
fire
and
was
burnt
in
doing
so
.
This
was
investigated
and
fairly
well
confirmed
by
many
witnesses
.
