-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Федор Достоевский
-
- Преступление и наказание
-
- Стр. 104/453
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
The
porter
and
Koch
and
Pestryakov
and
the
other
porter
and
the
wife
of
the
first
porter
and
the
woman
who
was
sitting
in
the
porter
’
s
lodge
and
the
man
Kryukov
,
who
had
just
got
out
of
a
cab
at
that
minute
and
went
in
at
the
entry
with
a
lady
on
his
arm
,
that
is
eight
or
ten
witnesses
,
agree
that
Nikolay
had
Dmitri
on
the
ground
,
was
lying
on
him
beating
him
,
while
Dmitri
hung
on
to
his
hair
,
beating
him
,
too
.
They
lay
right
across
the
way
,
blocking
the
thoroughfare
.
They
were
sworn
at
on
all
sides
while
they
‘
like
children
’
(
the
very
words
of
the
witnesses
)
were
falling
over
one
another
,
squealing
,
fighting
and
laughing
with
the
funniest
faces
,
and
,
chasing
one
another
like
children
,
they
ran
into
the
street
.
Now
take
careful
note
.
The
bodies
upstairs
were
warm
,
you
understand
,
warm
when
they
found
them
!
If
they
,
or
Nikolay
alone
,
had
murdered
them
and
broken
open
the
boxes
,
or
simply
taken
part
in
the
robbery
,
allow
me
to
ask
you
one
question
:
do
their
state
of
mind
,
their
squeals
and
giggles
and
childish
scuffling
at
the
gate
fit
in
with
axes
,
bloodshed
,
fiendish
cunning
,
robbery
?
They
’
d
just
killed
them
,
not
five
or
ten
minutes
before
,
for
the
bodies
were
still
warm
,
and
at
once
,
leaving
the
flat
open
,
knowing
that
people
would
go
there
at
once
,
flinging
away
their
booty
,
they
rolled
about
like
children
,
laughing
and
attracting
general
attention
.
And
there
are
a
dozen
witnesses
to
swear
to
that
!
”
“
Of
course
it
is
strange
!
It
’
s
impossible
,
indeed
,
but
.
.
.
”
“
No
,
brother
,
no
buts
.
And
if
the
ear
-
rings
being
found
in
Nikolay
’
s
hands
at
the
very
day
and
hour
of
the
murder
constitutes
an
important
piece
of
circumstantial
evidence
against
him
—
although
the
explanation
given
by
him
accounts
for
it
,
and
therefore
it
does
not
tell
seriously
against
him
—
one
must
take
into
consideration
the
facts
which
prove
him
innocent
,
especially
as
they
are
facts
that
cannot
be
denied
.
And
do
you
suppose
,
from
the
character
of
our
legal
system
,
that
they
will
accept
,
or
that
they
are
in
a
position
to
accept
,
this
fact
—
resting
simply
on
a
psychological
impossibility
—
as
irrefutable
and
conclusively
breaking
down
the
circumstantial
evidence
for
the
prosecution
?
No
,
they
won
’
t
accept
it
,
they
certainly
won
’
t
,
because
they
found
the
jewel
-
case
and
the
man
tried
to
hang
himself
,
‘
which
he
could
not
have
done
if
he
hadn
’
t
felt
guilty
.
’
That
’
s
the
point
,
that
’
s
what
excites
me
,
you
must
understand
!
”
“
Oh
,
I
see
you
are
excited
!
Wait
a
bit
.
I
forgot
to
ask
you
;
what
proof
is
there
that
the
box
came
from
the
old
woman
?
”
“
That
’
s
been
proved
,
”
said
Razumihin
with
apparent
reluctance
,
frowning
.
“
Koch
recognised
the
jewel
-
case
and
gave
the
name
of
the
owner
,
who
proved
conclusively
that
it
was
his
.
”
“
That
’
s
bad
.
Now
another
point
.
Did
anyone
see
Nikolay
at
the
time
that
Koch
and
Pestryakov
were
going
upstairs
at
first
,
and
is
there
no
evidence
about
that
?
”
“
Nobody
did
see
him
,
”
Razumihin
answered
with
vexation
.
“
That
’
s
the
worst
of
it
.
Even
Koch
and
Pestryakov
did
not
notice
them
on
their
way
upstairs
,
though
,
indeed
,
their
evidence
could
not
have
been
worth
much
.
They
said
they
saw
the
flat
was
open
,
and
that
there
must
be
work
going
on
in
it
,
but
they
took
no
special
notice
and
could
not
remember
whether
there
actually
were
men
at
work
in
it
.
”
“
Hm
!
.
.
.
So
the
only
evidence
for
the
defence
is
that
they
were
beating
one
another
and
laughing
.
That
constitutes
a
strong
presumption
,
but
.
.
.
How
do
you
explain
the
facts
yourself
?
”
