Понятно
Понятно
Для того чтобы воспользоваться закладками, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Отмена
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Отмена
481
But
why
are
you
to
be
a
clergyman
?
I
thought
that
was
always
the
lot
of
the
youngest
,
where
there
were
many
to
chuse
before
him
.
482
Do
you
think
the
church
itself
never
chosen
,
then
?
483
Never
is
a
black
word
.
But
yes
,
in
the
never
of
conversation
,
which
means
not
very
often
,
I
do
think
it
.
For
what
is
to
be
done
in
the
church
?
Men
love
to
distinguish
themselves
,
and
in
either
of
the
other
lines
distinction
may
be
gained
,
but
not
in
the
church
.
A
clergyman
is
nothing
.
Отключить рекламу
484
The
nothing
of
conversation
has
its
gradations
,
I
hope
,
as
well
as
the
never
.
A
clergyman
cannot
be
high
in
state
or
fashion
.
He
must
not
head
mobs
,
or
set
the
ton
in
dress
.
But
I
cannot
call
that
situation
nothing
which
has
the
charge
of
all
that
is
of
the
first
importance
to
mankind
,
individually
or
collectively
considered
,
temporally
and
eternally
,
which
has
the
guardianship
of
religion
and
morals
,
and
consequently
of
the
manners
which
result
from
their
influence
.
No
one
here
can
call
the
office
nothing
.
If
the
man
who
holds
it
is
so
,
it
is
by
the
neglect
of
his
duty
,
by
foregoing
its
just
importance
,
and
stepping
out
of
his
place
to
appear
what
he
ought
not
to
appear
.
485
You
assign
greater
consequence
to
the
clergyman
than
one
has
been
used
to
hear
given
,
or
than
I
can
quite
comprehend
.
486
One
does
not
see
much
of
this
influence
and
importance
in
society
,
and
how
can
it
be
acquired
where
they
are
so
seldom
seen
themselves
?
How
can
two
sermons
a
week
,
even
supposing
them
worth
hearing
,
supposing
the
preacher
to
have
the
sense
to
prefer
Blair
s
to
his
own
,
do
all
that
you
speak
of
?
govern
the
conduct
and
fashion
the
manners
of
a
large
congregation
for
the
rest
of
the
week
?
One
scarcely
sees
a
clergyman
out
of
his
pulpit
.
487
You
are
speaking
of
London
,
I
am
speaking
of
the
nation
at
large
.
Отключить рекламу
488
The
metropolis
,
I
imagine
,
is
a
pretty
fair
sample
of
the
rest
.
489
Not
,
I
should
hope
,
of
the
proportion
of
virtue
to
vice
throughout
the
kingdom
.
We
do
not
look
in
great
cities
for
our
best
morality
.
It
is
not
there
that
respectable
people
of
any
denomination
can
do
most
good
;
and
it
certainly
is
not
there
that
the
influence
of
the
clergy
can
be
most
felt
.
A
fine
preacher
is
followed
and
admired
;
but
it
is
not
in
fine
preaching
only
that
a
good
clergyman
will
be
useful
in
his
parish
and
his
neighbourhood
,
where
the
parish
and
neighbourhood
are
of
a
size
capable
of
knowing
his
private
character
,
and
observing
his
general
conduct
,
which
in
London
can
rarely
be
the
case
.
The
clergy
are
lost
there
in
the
crowds
of
their
parishioners
.
They
are
known
to
the
largest
part
only
as
preachers
.
And
with
regard
to
their
influencing
public
manners
,
Miss
Crawford
must
not
misunderstand
me
,
or
suppose
I
mean
to
call
them
the
arbiters
of
good
-
breeding
,
the
regulators
of
refinement
and
courtesy
,
the
masters
of
the
ceremonies
of
life
.
490
The
manners
I
speak
of
might
rather
be
called
conduct
,
perhaps
,
the
result
of
good
principles
;
the
effect
,
in
short
,
of
those
doctrines
which
it
is
their
duty
to
teach
and
recommend
;
and
it
will
,
I
believe
,
be
everywhere
found
,
that
as
the
clergy
are
,
or
are
not
what
they
ought
to
be
,
so
are
the
rest
of
the
nation
.