-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Агата Кристи
-
- Пуаро ведёт следствие
-
- Стр. 159/214
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
Poirot
made
a
gesture
of
anger
.
“
Ah
,
that
is
just
what
I
do
not
understand
!
It
is
inexplicable
—
stupid
!
They
have
all
their
arrangements
made
(
and
very
good
arrangements
too
!
)
for
the
abduction
,
and
yet
they
imperil
the
whole
affair
by
a
melodramatic
attack
,
worthy
of
a
Cinema
,
and
quite
as
unreal
.
It
is
almost
impossible
to
believe
in
it
,
with
its
band
of
masked
men
,
not
twenty
miles
from
London
!
”
“
Perhaps
they
were
two
quite
separate
attempts
which
happened
irrespective
of
each
other
,
”
I
suggested
.
“
Ah
,
no
,
that
would
be
too
much
of
a
coincidence
!
Then
,
further
—
who
is
the
traitor
?
There
must
have
been
a
traitor
—
in
the
first
affair
,
anyway
.
But
who
was
it
—
Daniels
or
O
’
Murphy
?
It
must
have
been
one
of
the
two
,
or
why
did
the
car
leave
the
main
road
?
We
cannot
suppose
that
the
Prime
Minister
connived
at
his
own
assassination
!
Did
O
’
Murphy
take
that
turning
of
his
own
accord
,
or
was
it
Daniels
who
told
him
to
do
so
?
”
“
Surely
it
must
have
been
O
’
Murphy
’
s
doing
.
”
“
Yes
,
because
if
it
was
Daniels
’
the
Prime
Minister
would
have
heard
the
order
,
and
would
have
asked
the
reason
.
But
there
are
altogether
too
many
‘
whys
’
in
this
affair
,
and
they
contradict
each
other
.
If
O
’
Murphy
is
an
honest
man
,
why
did
he
leave
the
main
road
?
But
if
he
was
a
dishonest
man
,
why
did
he
start
the
car
again
when
only
two
shots
had
been
fired
—
thereby
,
in
all
probability
,
saving
the
Prime
Minister
’
s
life
?
And
,
again
,
if
he
was
honest
,
why
did
he
,
immediately
on
leaving
Charing
Cross
,
drive
to
a
well
-
known
rendezvous
of
German
spies
?
”
“
It
looks
bad
,
”
I
said
.
“
Let
us
look
at
the
case
with
method
.
What
have
we
for
and
against
these
two
men
?
Take
O
’
Murphy
first
.
Against
:
that
his
conduct
in
leaving
the
main
road
was
suspicious
;
that
he
is
an
Irishman
from
County
Clare
;
that
he
has
disappeared
in
a
highly
suggestive
manner
.
For
:
that
his
promptness
in
restarting
the
car
saved
the
Premier
’
s
life
;
that
he
is
a
Scotland
Yard
man
,
and
,
obviously
,
from
the
post
allotted
to
him
,
a
trusted
detective
.
Now
for
Daniels
.
There
is
not
much
against
him
,
except
the
fact
that
nothing
is
known
of
his
antecedents
,
and
that
he
speaks
too
many
languages
for
a
good
Englishman
!
(
Pardon
me
,
mon
ami
,
but
,
as
linguists
,
you
are
deplorable
!
)
Now
for
him
,
we
have
the
fact
that
he
was
found
gagged
,
bound
,
and
chloroformed
—
which
does
not
look
as
though
he
had
anything
to
do
with
the
matter
.
”
“
He
might
have
gagged
and
bound
himself
,
to
divert
suspicion
.
”
