-
Главная
-
- Книги
-
- Авторы
-
- Агата Кристи
-
- Убийство на поле для гольфа
-
- Стр. 19/284
Для того чтобы воспользоваться озвучкой предложений, необходимо
Войти или зарегистрироваться
Озвучка предложений доступна при наличии PRO-доступа
Купить PRO-доступ
The
trained
observer
,
the
expert
,
without
doubt
he
is
useful
!
But
the
others
,
the
Hercules
Poirots
,
they
are
above
the
experts
!
To
them
the
experts
bring
the
facts
,
their
business
is
the
method
of
the
crime
,
its
logical
deduction
,
the
proper
sequence
and
order
of
the
facts
;
above
all
,
the
true
psychology
of
the
case
.
You
have
hunted
the
fox
,
yes
?
”
“
I
have
hunted
a
bit
,
now
and
again
,
”
I
said
,
rather
bewildered
by
this
abrupt
change
of
subject
.
“
Why
?
”
“
Eh
bien
,
this
hunting
of
the
fox
,
you
need
the
dogs
,
no
?
”
“
Hounds
,
”
I
corrected
gently
.
“
Yes
,
of
course
.
”
“
But
yet
,
”
Poirot
wagged
his
finger
at
me
.
“
You
did
not
descend
from
your
horse
and
run
along
the
ground
smelling
with
your
nose
and
uttering
loud
Ow
Ows
?
”
In
spite
of
myself
I
laughed
immoderately
.
Poirot
nodded
in
a
satisfied
manner
.
“
So
.
You
leave
the
work
of
the
d
—
hounds
to
the
hounds
.
Yet
you
demand
that
I
,
Hercule
Poirot
,
should
make
myself
ridiculous
by
lying
down
(
possibly
on
damp
grass
)
to
study
hypothetical
footprints
,
and
should
scoop
up
cigarette
ash
when
I
do
not
know
one
kind
from
the
other
.
Remember
the
Plymouth
Express
mystery
.
The
good
Japp
departed
to
make
a
survey
of
the
railway
line
.
When
he
returned
,
I
,
without
having
moved
from
my
apartments
,
was
able
to
tell
him
exactly
what
he
had
found
.
”
“
So
you
are
of
the
opinion
that
Japp
wasted
his
time
.
”
“
Not
at
all
,
since
his
evidence
confirmed
my
theory
.
But
I
should
have
wasted
my
time
if
I
had
gone
.
It
is
the
same
with
so
called
‘
experts
.
’
Remember
the
handwriting
testimony
in
the
Cavendish
Case
.
One
counsel
’
s
questioning
brings
out
testimony
as
to
the
resemblances
,
the
defence
brings
evidence
to
show
dissimilarity
.
All
the
language
is
very
technical
.
And
the
result
?
What
we
all
knew
in
the
first
place
.
The
writing
was
very
like
that
of
John
Cavendish
.
And
the
psychological
mind
is
faced
with
the
question
‘
Why
?
’
Because
it
was
actually
his
?
Or
because
some
one
wished
us
to
think
it
was
his
?
I
answered
that
question
,
mon
ami
,
and
answered
it
correctly
.
”
